Re: Copying an object

[steinhh(at)ulrik.uio.no (Stein Vidar Hagfors Haugan)]

In article <MPG.1236037e91c3d0539898d6@news.frii.com> 
davidf@dfanning.com (David Fanning) writes:

> > The best way I have found is to SAVE it then RESTORE it. My routine
> > MGH_OBJ_CLONE provides a convenient way to do this.
> [..]
> How do you get around the problem, Mark, of restoring
> an object and calling methods on it without first
> compiling the object method code? Or does your
> program design shield you from this problem?

In this case, we're just cloning an *existing* object. Whatever
problems were associated with undefined methods for the original
will apply to the clone. But no *additional* problems..

Regards,

Stein Vidar