[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines

Subject: Re: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines
From: Mirko Vukovic <mvukovic(at)taz.telusa.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 15:53:11 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.idl-pvwave
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
References: <7r90g4$rqb$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37D82EA9.BA62A369@wellesley.edu> <7r9jbl$aem$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <37DCCE9A.F1AC4BF1@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
Xref: news.doit.wisc.edu comp.lang.idl-pvwave:16519

In article <37DCCE9A.F1AC4BF1@zedat.fu-berlin.de>,
  fit@functional-imaging.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so let us discuss strategies to migrate from IDL to something
reasonable
> (almost everything without common blocks and childish attempts to be
object
> oriented).
>
Can you give some examples of ``something reasonable''?  I am
very much in the dark about other options other than C++.

Mirko


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

References:
- ODEPACK
  - From: ushomirs
- a plea for more reliable mathematical routines
  - From: Richard G. French
- Re: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines
  - From: ushomirs
- Re: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines
  - From: FIT

Prev by Date: Re: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines
Next by Date: Re: Best,Fastest platform for IDL 5.2 (NT or UNIX)
Prev by thread: Re: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines
Next by thread: Re: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread