[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spawn broken on IDL 5.3 / solaris ?
- Subject: Re: spawn broken on IDL 5.3 / solaris ?
- From: "Craig Hamilton" <cah(at)medeng.wfubmc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 20:09:05 -0500
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.idl-pvwave
- Organization: Wake Forest University
- References: <yobg0tgpfin.fsf@mt11.gfz-potsdam.de>
- Xref: news.doit.wisc.edu comp.lang.idl-pvwave:19061
Martin:
Unix IDL 5.3 also has another problem: idlde doesn't handle files greater
than
a few hundred lines in its editor. More lines than that and they just don't
show
up on the screen. Tech support told me they switched to a 3rd party
chroma-color-enabled editor in 5.3. They did not tell me when to expect
a fix.
Craig
-Craig A. Hamilton,PhD crhamilt@wfubmc.edu
-Wake Forest Univ. School of Medicine
-Dept. of Med. Engr. / MRI Center
-Medical Center Blvd.
-Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1022
-(336)716-2819 [FAX: 2870] [Secr: 6890]
Martin Rother <rother@mt11.gfz-potsdam.de> wrote in message
news:yobg0tgpfin.fsf@mt11.gfz-potsdam.de...
>
> hi IDL wizards,
>
> (first I apologize for my bad english)
>
> I'm running IDL scripts communicating with fortran-programs
> (f77, i.e. calculation of geomag.field/IGRF) by bidirectional pipes
> created from 'spawn' command (with keyword 'unit')
>
> this works fine for years. now (with IDL 5.3) I found the spawned
program
> vanished without any message, more or less immediately -- and
> the next (first) 'readf, unit, buf' fail, of course -- or, worse,
> IDL terminates with 'segmentation fault'.
>
> I found that this 'segmentation fault' depends on
> the way I'm assembling the string given into the pipe.
>
> only if the string is created by a simple dummy = 'something' statement
> printing/writing from pipe succeed.
>
> after downgrading to 'IDL 5.2' all is working fine again.
> I can't belive, that THIS usefull feature (one benefit
> of IDL over 'matlab'?) is broken. kkkkrrrrxxxxxxx....!
>
> I searched 'dejanews' and found some articles about this (or similar)
> subject, but I found no workaround and remain hopeless.
>
> have I to stick on version 5.2 forever?
>
> (my environment: sparc, solaris 2.6 + 2.7 and enough memory...)
>
> thanks in advance for hints.
>
> best regards,
> martin rother.
>
> --
> Martin Rother (rother@gfz-potsdam.de) 0331/ 288-1272 Division
2.3
> GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam,
Germany