Re: Plot [snip!] feature (was: Re: Plot bug or another "strange feature" ?)

["Liam E.Gumley" <Liam.Gumley(at)ssec.wisc.edu>]

Nicolas Decoster wrote:
[stuff deleted]
> I agree with you, my double precision data are beyond the boundaries of
> the plot procedure. I think the real issue here is: "is the float
> conversion is a good choice". It is the RSI choice and it is ok in most
> case. It just does not fit my perticular need. But a choice can't fit
> all needs. Ok. Perhaps some other RSI choices will fit some of my needs
> (*). Let's follow the "no exceptation" strategy suggested by David.

FYI: Don't quote me, but I hear that the low-level plotting routines are
modified to use double precision by default in IDL 5.4.

Cheers,
Liam.