[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: findng array[3] in array[3,n]

Subject: Re: findng array[3] in array[3,n]
From: davidf(at)dfanning.com (David Fanning)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 10:31:48 -0700
Newsgroups: comp.lang.idl-pvwave
Organization: Fanning Software Consulting
References: <94pl74$rec$1@ra.nrl.navy.mil> <3A706156.38C4065A@astro.cornell.edu>
Xref: news.doit.wisc.edu comp.lang.idl-pvwave:23172

JD Smith (jdsmith@astro.cornell.edu) writes:
 
> I can't say it's elegant, but:
> 
> where(total(rebin(b,n_elements(b),(size(a,/DIMENSIONS))[1],/SAMP) eq
> a,1) eq n_elements(b))
> 
> The rule is, when comparing arrays, you must expand the smaller to the
> size of the larger.

I'm curious, JD. Are you any good with crossword puzzles?
I'm looking for a seven letter word that ....  :-)

Cheers,

David

-- 
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438 E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155

References:
- findng array[3] in array[3,n]
  - From: tbowers
- Re: findng array[3] in array[3,n]
  - From: JD Smith

Prev by Date: Re: findng array[3] in array[3,n]
Next by Date: Re: findng array[3] in array[3,n]
Prev by thread: Re: findng array[3] in array[3,n]
Next by thread: Re: findng array[3] in array[3,n]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread