[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: array dimensions

Subject: Re: array dimensions
From: davidf(at)dfanning.com (David Fanning)
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2001 08:09:32 -0600
Newsgroups: comp.lang.idl-pvwave
Organization: Fanning Software Consulting
References: <3acef64d.8348291@news.galactica.it> <MPG.1538cc23965253d9989dda@news.frii.com> <3ACFA58A.9846C8D3@wellesley.edu> <ond7anpl65.fsf@cow.physics.wisc.edu>
Xref: news.doit.wisc.edu comp.lang.idl-pvwave:24438

Craig Markwardt (craigmnet@cow.physics.wisc.edu) writes:

> The DIMENSION keyword is *new* when judged by the "all these years"
> standard.  It first appeared in IDL 5.1.

Wasn't it IDL 5.3? I know I had nothing but trouble
using it for the longest time. I really didn't start
using the keyword in public programs until IDL 5.4
had been out for 6 months or so. :-)

Cheers,

David

-- 
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438 E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155

Follow-Ups:
- Re: array dimensions
  - From: Craig Markwardt

References:
- array dimensions
  - From: Francesco
- Re: array dimensions
  - From: David Fanning
- Re: array dimensions
  - From: Richard G. French
- Re: array dimensions
  - From: Craig Markwardt

Prev by Date: Re: array dimensions
Next by Date: Re: array dimensions
Prev by thread: Re: array dimensions
Next by thread: Re: array dimensions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread