[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Testers needed for TV benchmark
- Subject: Re: Testers needed for TV benchmark
- From: Dennis Boccippio <djboccip(at)hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:11:21 -0500
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.idl-pvwave
- Organization: BELLSOUTH.net
- Posted-And-Mailed: yes
- References: <269b6343.0108080924.2bd48749@posting.google.com>
- User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.1 (PPC)
- Xref: news.doit.wisc.edu comp.lang.idl-pvwave:26143
IDL 5.3, MacOS 9.1, Powerbook G3/300:
TV-Device Copy Test: Array Size: 512 6.1833333 seconds
=> Frames/sec:
8.0862534 Frame time: 0.12366667
Video Xfer rate: 6359288.5bytes/sec
TV Direct Test: Array Size: 512 5.2666667 seconds
=> Frames/sec:
9.4936709 Frame time: 0.10533333
Video Xfer rate: 7466126.6bytes/sec
In article <269b6343.0108080924.2bd48749@posting.google.com>,
billb@attinet.com (Bill B.) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been working at trying to get the fastest TV update rate possible
> and am a little discouraged by my results so far. I developed a short
> benchmark program and am curious what results might be obtained by
> other machines. I have a P3-550 and obtained the following:
>
> TV-Device Copy Test: Array Size: 512 13.520000 seconds
> => Frames/sec: 3.6982249 Frame time: 0.27040000
> Video Xfer rate: 2908402.4 bytes/sec
>
> TV Direct Test: Array Size: 512 13.290000 seconds =>
> Frames/sec: 3.7622272 Frame time: 0.26580000
> Video Xfer rate: 2958735.9 bytes/sec
>
> If your time permits, I would appreciate knowing anyone else's results
> and a brief mention of the computer used. My benchmarks were
> identical for IDL 5.2 and 5.3.1. Thanks in advance.
>
> Bill B.
>